The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ramirez v. Collier centered on Texas death row inmate John Henry Ramirez’s request to have his Baptist pastor pray aloud and lay hands on him during his execution by lethal injection. Ramirez, convicted for a 2004 murder, did not contest his guilt but sought religious accommodations under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). Texas officials denied this request, citing security concerns.
In March 2022, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of Ramirez, stating that while states can limit spiritual activities in execution chambers, outright bans violate religious rights. This ruling set a precedent allowing such spiritual practices in prisons across the U.S.
Following the decision, Nueces County District Attorney Mark Gonzalez withdrew Ramirez’s death warrant, citing ethical opposition to the death penalty. The case marked a significant victory for religious liberty, with widespread national attention. Attorney Seth Kretzer, who argued the case, praised the ruling and noted its broader impact on American legal and religious principles.
CNN has quoted Seth Kretzer in an article. Click here to read the text.
CNN has written an article on Ramirez v. Collier. Click here to read the text.
Bloomberg Law has written an article on Ramirez v. Collier. Click here to read the text.
The New York Times has written an article on Ramirez v. Collier. Click here to read the text.
Click here to view the feature by Harvard Law Review
Click here to view updates about Ramirez v. Collier on SCOTUSblog.